¾«¶«Ó°Òµ

Research shows the much-maligned aid to the poor buys broad economic and public health gains.

In September, just two days after a showed that food stamps helped keep 4 million ¾«¶«Ó°Òµns out of poverty last year, the US House of Representatives approved aÌý (known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP) over the next decade.

The House proposal, now being negotiated along with smaller, yet still significant, , would result in 3.8 million people being removed from food stamps in 2014, . The haggling comes at a time when more than 15 percent of ¾«¶«Ó°Òµns remain mired in poverty, and when stagnant middle-class wages are matched against rising costs of living, US Census data show.

Although the Republican-controlled House cuts are unlikely, given a promised veto from President Obama, food stamps will still be slashed by , when the 2009 Recovery Act that increased the aid along with other stimulus spending expires. The 13.6 percent temporary boost in food stamp dollars helped more than half a million ¾«¶«Ó°Òµns escape food insecurity, and millions more to climb out of poverty—alone, according the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP).

go to households with children, seniors, and nonelderly people with disabilities. The Nov. 1 reduction means $36 less per month for a family of four and $11 less for a single person. In 2012, the average recipient got $133.41 in food stamps per month—that works out to $1.48 per meal.Ìý“Without the Recovery Act’s boost, SNAP benefits will average less thanÌý$1.40Ìýper person per meal in 2014,” reports the CBPP.Ìý

“The Republican attack on food stamps is “totally counter-factual,” says Peter Edelman, a professor of law at Georgetown University and a former Clinton administration official who resigned in protest of the 1996 welfare overhaul. “Millions of people are unemployed and millions more don’t earn enough to pay all their bills. The idea that food stamps, which provide support at one-third of the poverty line, is incentivizing people not to seek jobs that don’t exist anyway is beyond bizarre.”

Extensive research shows food stamps are a highly effective investment delivering big returns for all ¾«¶«Ó°Òµns, not just the poor. SNAP not only provides an economic and nutritional lifeline for low-income ¾«¶«Ó°Òµns, it also creates a significant boon to the wider economy.

The Economic Benefits of Food Stamps

When food stamps get spent, we all benefit. Despite critics’ focus on the costs of SNAP, has shown that these dollars are among the best forms of government stimulus. Food stamp spending generates local economic activity, jobs in the farm and retail sectors and beyond.

Ìý

Source: